Case 3306562/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Diana Mayoral Tasies v Cambridgeshire University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306562/2021
- Decision date
- 12 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michell Eleanor
- Venue
- Cambridge
- Panel members
- Eleanor Deem, Karen Omer
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms Diana Mayoral Tasies
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cambridge by Employment Judge Michell, sitting with lay members Eleanor Deem and Karen Omer. Ms Diana Mayoral Tasies did not appear and was not represented; the respondents were represented by Mr Richard Hignett.
The tribunal's unanimous decision was that the claimant's sex discrimination claim under s.13 Equality Act 2010 and her sex-related harassment claim under s.26 Equality Act 2010 were not well founded. Both claims were dismissed.
The written record does not set out separate reasons or any monetary award, and no remedy is recorded in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Sex discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Sex-related harassment under s.26 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.