Case 3306579/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Corben v Mitie Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3306579/2020
- Decision date
- 30 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Corben
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 23 April 2021 giving him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing, so the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as including unfair dismissal; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as including unlawful deduction from wages; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as including Working Time Regulations; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.