Case 3306660/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Valdas Petrulenas v DHL Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3306660/2019
- Decision date
- 6 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Valdas Petrulenas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims against DHL Services Limited for a redundancy payment and for "other payments". The hearing was before Employment Judge Michell sitting alone at Cambridge on 21 November 2019.
The judgment records that the claimant withdrew those claims. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claims pursuant to rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the redundancy payment claim was dismissed pursuant to rule 52 upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment describes this only as a claim for "other payments" and states it was dismissed pursuant to rule 52 upon withdrawal by the claimant; the exact payment type is not specified in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- r.52 of Sch 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.