Case 3306690/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Leila Bahrami v Activate Learning Education Trust t/a UTC Reading — 2022
- Case reference
- 3306690/2020
- Decision date
- 20 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan Members
- Panel members
- Mr F Wright, Ms F Potter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Leila Bahrami
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading by CVP video hearing on 12-15 September 2022 before Employment Judge Skehan, sitting with members Mr F Wright and Ms F Potter. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims for direct discrimination, harassment and victimisation contrary to the Equality Act 2010 were unsuccessful and dismissed. The extracted record does not set out the protected characteristic or characteristics relied on, any further factual findings, or any legal analysis beyond the dismissal outcome.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records a direct discrimination claim under the Equality Act 2010, but the extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic or characteristics. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.