Case 3306976/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Veleta Brown v LHR Airports Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3306976/2023
- Decision date
- 25 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Poynton
- Panel members
- Mr D Sutton, Dr C Whitehouse
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Veleta Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, employed by LHR Airports Limited as a Delivery Project Manager from 18 July 2022 until her resignation on 7 June 2023, brought claims of direct race discrimination and harassment related to race, together with a claim of constructive unfair/wrongful dismissal which she later withdrew. The discrimination and harassment claims concerned a private security search on 13 October 2022, the Respondent's response to her subsequent complaint, the alleged failure to register that complaint as a formal grievance, and the conduct and outcome of the grievance process (added by amendment).
The Tribunal accepted that the private search followed the airport's security process after the archway scanner triggered and Ms Monfries was unable to satisfy herself that there was no ongoing security concern following the public pat down and wand scan. It concluded that being subjected to a private search in that context did not amount to a detriment and that the Asian female comparator relied on was not in materially the same circumstances. The Tribunal found no evidence from which it could conclude that the treatment was because of the Claimant's race.
The Tribunal noted shortcomings in the search process, in the handling of the Claimant's complaint and in the grievance process, and acknowledged that the Claimant found the experience distressing and humiliating. It nevertheless concluded that the reason for the Respondent's treatment was a lack of care, attention to detail and focus on the part of the investigating managers rather than a discriminatory motivation, and no inference of discrimination could reasonably be drawn. All claims of direct race discrimination and harassment were unanimously dismissed; the constructive unfair/wrongful dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination claim relating to a private security search on 13 October 2022, the response to the Claimant's complaint of 14 October 2022, the alleged failure to register her complaint as a grievance on 24 October 2022, and the conduct and outcome of the grievance investigation, appeal and outcome (added by amendment). The Tribunal found the claim not well founded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race, pleaded in the alternative on the same factual allegations as the direct discrimination claim. The Tribunal found the claim not well founded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Claim of constructive unfair / wrongful dismissal was withdrawn by the Claimant (email of 15 April 2024, confirmed at hearing) and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Shamoon v Chief Constable of RUC [2003] UKHL 11
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.