Case 3307009/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mohammed Tahir Bhatti v Gmb — 2025
- Case reference
- 3307009/2022
- Decision date
- 20 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Young Non
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Ms J Hancock, Ms A Telfer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mohammed Tahir Bhatti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Watford, before Employment Judge Young sitting with Ms J Hancock and Ms A Telfer, dismissed all of Mr Mohammed Tahir Bhatti's claims against GMB. The judgment records that the claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, holiday pay, direct race discrimination and harassment were each found not well founded and dismissed.
The extracted judgment text does not include the tribunal's detailed reasons. It records that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that the written record contains only the dispositive findings. No monetary award was made, and no remedy breakdown is recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.