Case 3307564/2023 · Employment Tribunal

In person For the v Respondent — 2025

Case reference: 3307564/2023
Decision date: 27 June 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge M Warren Members
Venue: Norwich
Panel members: Ms J Buck, Ms S Williams

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal found that Mr Gallop was disabled by depression and ME/CFS and that several complaints of disability discrimination succeeded. It upheld complaints of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and harassment related to disability.

The tribunal dismissed the complaint of indirect disability discrimination. On time limits, it found a continuing act from 23 February 2022 through to the dismissal appeal outcome, referring to a prevailing culture or mindset of impatience and irritation among those dealing with Mr Gallop on the respondent's behalf.

No compensation was determined in this judgment. Remedy was listed for a separate hearing on 11 and 12 May 2026, and the tribunal made preliminary observations only about issues that might affect any future award.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	Complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was well-founded and succeeded. Remedy was reserved to a later hearing.	Upheld	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability was well-founded and succeeded. Remedy was reserved to a later hearing.	Upheld	Disability	—
Harassment	Complaint of harassment related to disability was well-founded and succeeded. Remedy was reserved to a later hearing.	Upheld	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	Complaint of indirect disability discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

4 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.