Case 3307759/2024 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance. For the v Sol Attendance Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3307759/2024
- Decision date
- 14 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grahame Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant and the respondents did not attend the hearing before Employment Judge Grahame Anderson at Watford by CVP on 17 April 2025.
Pursuant to rule 47, the tribunal dismissed the claim for non-attendance. The written judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the claim for non-attendance under rule 47. The specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing categories because the short judgment does not separately describe each claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses the claim for non-attendance under rule 47. The specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing categories because the short judgment does not separately describe each claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the claim for non-attendance under rule 47. The specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing categories because the short judgment does not separately describe each claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment dismisses the claim for non-attendance under rule 47. The specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing categories because the short judgment does not separately describe each claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.