Case 3308077/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Williams v Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 3308077/2023
- Decision date
- 27 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 15 May 2024, Employment Judge Quill, sitting alone, struck out the entire claim. The judgment states that the claim had no reasonable prospects of success because the tribunal did not have jurisdiction.
No findings on the merits were made. The judgment records only the jurisdictional strike-out and does not contain any award or split of remedy between claim types.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not list the pleaded issues individually, but the case context identifies a disability discrimination claim and the entire claim was struck out for lack of jurisdiction. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment does not list the pleaded issues individually, but the case context identifies a redundancy pay claim and the entire claim was struck out for lack of jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not list the pleaded issues individually, but the case context identifies an unfair dismissal claim and the entire claim was struck out for lack of jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.