Case 3308692/2024 · Employment Tribunal
3D Force Ltd v The Construction Industry Training Board — 2025
- Case reference
- 3308692/2024
- Decision date
- 17 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mrs P Barratt, Mrs J Hancock
Parties
2 namedClaimant
3D Force Ltd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe appellant, 3D Force Ltd, a small company carrying out mostly kitchen and bathroom refurbishment as a subcontractor under the Construction Industry Scheme, appealed against a levy of £5,147 imposed by the Construction Industry Training Board by notice dated 22 April 2024. The appeal was brought on three grounds: that the appellant was not in a category of business subject to the levy; that the levy had been incorrectly calculated; and that other businesses in similar circumstances had not been subjected to the levy.
On the first ground, the tribunal found that kitchen installation and refurbishment fell within the wide statutory definition of activities of the construction industry under Schedule 1 of the Industrial Training Construction Board Order 1964, and that the appellant was an employer for the purposes of the 2022 Order. On the second ground, the tribunal accepted the respondent's calculation, which used a multiplier of 5 applied to the declared Box C figure of £81,433 (representing the 20% CIS deduction from payments to net paid subcontractors under section 61 of the Finance Act 2004) to approximate labour costs of £407,165, with the levy then computed at 1.25%. Because the figure was above the £400,000 threshold, no Small Business Levy Reduction applied. On the third ground, the tribunal held that whether other companies had or had not been assessed was not relevant to whether the rules applied to this appellant.
The tribunal unanimously confirmed the levy and dismissed the appeal. It noted that the respondent had indicated willingness to discuss payment by instalments, although the tribunal had no power to order such an arrangement.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Appeal under sections 12(4) and (5) of the Industrial Training Act 1982 against a construction industry levy of £5,147 imposed by the Construction Industry Training Board under the Industrial Training Levy (Construction Industry Training Board) Order 2022. Not an employment claim; the tribunal confirmed the levy and dismissed the appeal on all three grounds. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- sections 12(4) and (5) of the Industrial Training Act 1982
- Industrial Training Construction Board Order 1964
- Industrial Training Levy (Construction Industry Training Board) Order 2022
- section 61 of the Finance Act 2004
- The Queen on the Application of Bobcat Plant Hire (UK) Ltd v CITB [2003] EWHC 2383 (Admin)
- Mark Wilkinson Furniture Ltd v CITB [2000] 7 WLUK 838
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.