Case 3309300/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Gordon Peaurt v Cutting Edge Precision Engineering Ltd (in liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3309300/2023
- Decision date
- 20 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Malik
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Gordon Peaurt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford on 20 August 2025, Employment Judge Malik sitting alone determined two claims brought by Gordon Peaurt against Cutting Edge Precision Engineering Limited (in administration). The respondent did not attend. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing and the written record records only the operative decision.
The claim for redundancy payment succeeded, and the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £10,609.50. The separate claim for payment of holiday pay accrued but untaken at the date of termination also succeeded, with an award of £1,891.26.
The tribunal recorded a total amount payable of £12,500.76 for the two successful claims. No separate breakdown of the total into additional heads of loss, interest, or other remedy components is set out in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £10,610 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for holiday pay accrued but untaken at the date of termination. | Upheld | — | £1,891 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,501
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.