Case 3309911/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Hamza Ibrahim v Stanmore Implants Worldwide Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309911/2022
- Decision date
- 14 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Young Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr D Bean, Mr P Hough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Hamza Ibrahim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Watford, chaired by Employment Judge Young with lay members Mr D Bean and Mr P Hough, heard the case on 3-4 July 2023 and gave reasons orally. It dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim as unfounded.
The tribunal also dismissed the harassment claim under section 26 Equality Act 2010 because it was out of time. It declined to extend time and said it therefore did not have jurisdiction to consider that claim.
The claimant's claim for direct discrimination on the grounds of age under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was also found to be unfounded and dismissed. The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | Found to be out of time; the tribunal did not exercise its discretion to extend time and held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Direct discrimination claim under section 13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.