Case 3310050/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr S Davies (counsel – unregistered) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310050/2023
- Decision date
- 9 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
- Panel members
- Mrs A Bray, Mr R Allan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal sat at Bury St Edmunds on 19 to 23 August 2024 before Employment Judge K J Palmer with members Mrs A Bray and Mr R Allan. In its unanimous judgment, it held that the Claimant was not a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. On that basis, the Claimant's disability discrimination claims failed and were dismissed.
The Tribunal also dismissed the Claimant's claim for constructive unfair dismissal. The written record does not set out any remedy because no claim succeeded. The judgment notes that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal found the Claimant was not a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010, so the disability discrimination claims failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The Claimant's claim for constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.