Loading…

Mr Andrew Byford v London Borough of Hillingdon — Employment Tribunal 2023 | Tribunal Watch

Case 3310152/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mr Andrew Byford v London Borough of Hillingdon — 2023

Case reference: 3310152/2022
Decision date: 6 July 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Bansal Representation

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Andrew Byford

Respondent

London Borough of Hillingdon

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The hearing took place before Employment Judge Bansal at Watford by CVP on 14 June 2023. The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend his claim.

The written judgment states that the claimant's complaint of making a protected disclosure pursuant to s47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal then recorded that, because there were no outstanding complaints, the entirety of the claim was dismissed.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Whistleblowing	The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend. It struck out the complaint of making a protected disclosure under s47B Employment Rights Act 1996 pursuant to rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.