Case 3310624/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Dancer v Travis Perkins Trading Company Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310624/2023
- Decision date
- 27 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Dancer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a notice to show cause dated 18 April 2024, the tribunal gave Mr Dancer an opportunity to make representations as to why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 6 February 2024 and the matter had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. Employment Judge Anstis signed the judgment on 11 July 2024, and it was sent to the parties on 27 August 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment struck out the claim after a notice to show cause because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 6 February 2024 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the claim after a notice to show cause because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 6 February 2024 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim after a notice to show cause because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 6 February 2024 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.