Case 3311348/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Allbright v The London Borough of Haringey — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311348/2024
- Decision date
- 12 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Allbright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Case Management Preliminary Hearing before Employment Judge M Warren, sitting at Norwich by CVP on 12 November 2025. The Claimant, Miss E Allbright, remains employed by the Respondent as a Housing Officer and issued proceedings on 4 November 2024. The hearing was listed to consider applications to amend, an application by the Respondent for a Deposit Order, and case management.
The Tribunal granted the Claimant's application to amend her claim insofar as the amendments were reflected in the List of Issues agreed at the hearing; the Respondent did not object to those changes. A further application by the Claimant to amend to add additional complaints of harassment related to disability and victimisation was refused. The Respondent's application for a Deposit Order was also refused.
No substantive findings were made on the underlying claims (which include disability discrimination, harassment related to disability and victimisation), and no remedy was awarded. The reasons section sets out the legal framework on amendments by reference to Selkent, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg, Abercrombie and Vaughan, and on time limits under s.123 Equality Act 2010.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Case management preliminary hearing only. The Tribunal ruled on three procedural applications: (1) the Claimant's application to amend her claim, in the terms set out in the agreed List of Issues, was granted; (2) her further application to amend to add additional complaints of harassment related to disability and victimisation was refused; (3) the Respondent's application for a Deposit Order was refused. The substantive complaints (disability discrimination, harassment related to disability, victimisation) were not adjudicated at this hearing. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Rule 30 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024
- Selkent Bus Co v Moore [1996] ICR 836
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan [2018] EWCA Civ 640
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble [1997] IRLR 336
- Abercrombie v Aga Rangemaster Ltd [2014] ICR 209
- Vaughan v Modality Partnership [2021] ICR 535
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.