Case 3311380/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Waithaka v Barclays plc and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311380/2022
- Decision date
- 17 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley Appearances
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr W Waithaka
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short procedural judgment heard in private by telephone before Employment Judge Eeley on 17 April 2023. The claimant was Mr W Waithaka and the respondents were Barclays Plc, Barclays Bank Plc and Barclays Execution Services Ltd. No lay members are listed.
By consent, the tribunal ordered that the first and second respondents, Barclays Plc and Barclays Bank Plc, be dismissed from the proceedings. The effect of the order was to leave Barclays Execution Services Ltd as the sole respondent in the proceedings.
The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability, no legal test is cited, and no remedy or monetary award is set out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a short consent order only. It records that the first and second respondents, Barclays Plc and Barclays Bank Plc, were dismissed from the proceedings, leaving Barclays Execution Services Ltd as the sole respondent. No substantive claim was determined and no merits outcome was recorded. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.