Case 3311529/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Nemeth v London Underground Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311529/2022
- Decision date
- 1 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Nemeth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 6 September 2023 giving an opportunity by 20 September 2023 to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 15 June 2023, lack of active pursuit, and reasons set out in the respondent's representative's email of 4 September 2023.
As of 1 November 2023, the claimant had not made written representations and had not asked for a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim, and the scheduled hearing listed for 7 to 10 November 2023 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The gov.uk listing categories identify unfair dismissal, but the judgment itself does not set out the individual heads of claim; it states that the claim is struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The gov.uk listing categories identify disability discrimination, but the judgment itself does not set out the individual heads of claim; it states that the claim is struck out. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.