Case 3311616/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311616/2023
- Decision date
- 27 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Mr B McSweeney, Mr C Grant
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded a unanimous judgment after a hearing at Bury St Edmunds, heard partly in person and partly by CVP. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The written judgment states that the claimant's claims for direct disability, race, sex and age discrimination, indirect disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, reasonable adjustments, harassment related to disability, race, sex and age, and victimisation all failed and were dismissed. The written record does not set out detailed reasons because reasons were given orally and written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
9 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Age discrimination | Direct age discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect disability discrimination under s.19 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Reasonable adjustments claims under ss.20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 were dismissed. | Dismissed |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.19 Equality Act 2010
- s.15 Equality Act 2010
- ss.20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- s.27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.