Case 3311826/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Pardes v Transport for London — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311826/2022
- Decision date
- 11 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Coll
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Pardes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment struck out the claimant's claims of discrimination because of sex and race under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, and harassment with the protected characteristics of race and sex under section 26 of that Act.
The tribunal recorded that at a preliminary hearing on 14 June 2023 the claimant agreed to race-related claims, including race discrimination and racial harassment, being struck out. For the other claims, the tribunal sent a strike-out warning on 9 November 2023 because the claimant had failed to comply with an earlier order and on the basis that the claim as a whole had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not respond by the deadline of 4pm on 17 November 2023, did not request a hearing, and had still not responded by the date of judgment. The tribunal therefore struck out the claims described in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Claim of discrimination because of sex within the meaning of section 13 Equality Act 2010 was struck out. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | Claim of discrimination because of race within the meaning of section 13 Equality Act 2010 was struck out. The judgment records that the claimant had earlier agreed to race-related claims being struck out. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Harassment | Harassment claim with race as the protected characteristic for the purposes of section 26 Equality Act 2010 was struck out. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Harassment | Harassment claim with sex as the protected characteristic for the purposes of section 26 Equality Act 2010 was struck out. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- rule 37
- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- section 39 Equality Act 2010
- section 40 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.