Case 3311850/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Barry Lasoju v XMA Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311850/2023
- Decision date
- 26 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Barry Lasoju
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 26 September 2024, Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto struck out the claim brought by Mr Barry Lasoju against XMA Limited. The judgment records that the complaint was about failure to consult and inform under regulation 15 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006.
The tribunal found that the complaint had been presented outside the statutory time limit. It further found that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the complaint within time. On that basis, the employment tribunal could not consider the complaint and the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The claimant's complaint under regulation 15 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 was presented outside the time limit. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time, so the tribunal could not consider it. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.