Loading page content.
TopEmployer file
Since 2017, XMA Ltd has appeared as a respondent in 3 employment tribunal cases, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases | Relative share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Unfair dismissal | 2 | |
| 02 | Age discrimination | 1 | |
| 03 | Disability discrimination | 1 | |
| 04 | Race discrimination | 1 | |
| 05 | Breach of contract | 1 | |
| 06 | Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | 1 | |
| 07 | Unlawful deduction from wages | 1 | |
| 08 | Working time regulations | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3302932/2024 | 12 August 2025 | England & Wales | Mr Barry Lasoju | Age discrimination, Disability discrimination, Race discrimination, Unfair dismissal | — |
| 3311850/2023 | 26 September 2024 | England & Wales | Mr Barry Lasoju | Breach of contract, Transfer of undertakings (TUPE), Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | — |
| 6000713/2023 | 7 July 2023 | England & Wales | Mr Z Ahmad | Unfair dismissal | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.