Case 3312049/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Eastman (wife of Claimant) For the v Mr Jones (consultant) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312049/2020
- Decision date
- 19 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Eastman (wife of Claimant) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written record states that the tribunal gave its reasons orally at the remote hearing on 18 August 2021. The claimant’s claim for unfair dismissal succeeded, and the claim for unlawful deduction from wages also succeeded. The claimant’s claim for failure to provide terms and conditions was dismissed.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a total of £5,699.21. That sum was recorded as comprising £4,857.95 for unfair dismissal and £841.26 for unlawful deduction of wages. The written record does not break the unfair dismissal award into basic and compensatory elements, and no separate remedy was recorded for the dismissed terms-and-conditions complaint.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,858 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £841 |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide terms and conditions dismissed; the judgment does not identify a more specific taxonomy category. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,699
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.