Case 3312383/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312383/2020
- Decision date
- 5 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's direct discrimination claim based on sex because it had no reasonable prospect of success. No remedy was awarded in relation to that claim.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's sexual harassment claim. It found that the claim was out of time and decided not to exercise its discretion under s.123 of the Equality Act 2010 to allow it to proceed. No compensation or other monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's direct sex discrimination claim was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The judgment refers to a claim described as 'sexual harassment'; it was dismissed because it was out of time and the tribunal did not exercise its discretion under s.123 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.123 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.