Case 3312470/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Vrioni-Wright v Chicheley Hotel Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312470/2022
- Decision date
- 25 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Margo Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Vrioni-Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Watford, after a hearing on 9 to 11 August 2023 before Employment Judge Margo Representation, found that Miss T Vrioni-Wright was subjected to harassment related to her sex on 12 April 2022 and 25 May 2022. It held that Chicheley Hotel Ltd was vicariously liable for those acts.
The judgment records that the remainder of the claimant’s claims were dismissed. The extracted text does not set out those other claims individually, so only the sex-related harassment claim is identified as upheld on the face of the decision.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded £6,150 and interest of £655.34, calculated at 8% from 12 April 2022 to 11 August 2023. The total payable was £6,805.34.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The tribunal found harassment related to sex on 12 April 2022 and 25 May 2022. It recorded that the respondent was vicariously liable for those acts. Interest of £655.34 was awarded separately on the £6,150 award. | Upheld | Sex | £6,150 |
| Other | The tribunal stated that the remainder of the claimant’s claims were dismissed. The extracted text does not identify those claims individually. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,805
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.