Case 3312474/2020 · Employment Tribunal

(1) Miss R Ziolo - Hitch (2) Miss S Gibson (3) Mr D Kavanagh v Stevenage Conference Centre Limited — 2021

Case reference: 3312474/2020
Decision date: 1 September 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ord Date

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

(1) Miss R Ziolo - Hitch (2) Miss S Gibson (3) Mr D Kavanagh

Respondent

Stevenage Conference Centre Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It recorded that the claimants' claims against Stevenage Conference Centre Limited succeeded.

The judgment did not determine compensation or other remedy. It stated that the remedy to which the claimants were entitled would be determined at a remedy hearing.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Breach of Contract. The judgment itself states only that the claims succeed under Rule 21 and does not set out the individual causes of action.	Upheld	—	—
Redundancy	The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Redundancy. The judgment itself states only that the claims succeed under Rule 21 and does not set out the individual causes of action.	Upheld	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Unlawful Deduction from Wages. The judgment itself states only that the claims succeed under Rule 21 and does not set out the individual causes of action.	Upheld	—	—
Working time regulations	The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Working Time Regulations. The judgment itself states only that the claims succeed under Rule 21 and does not set out the individual causes of action.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.