Case 3312511/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Janice Trustram v Easyjet Airline Company Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3312511/2023
- Decision date
- 10 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mrs G Bhatt MBE, Mr S Woodward
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Janice Trustram
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford Employment Tribunal on 1, 2, 3 and 4 April 2025 before Employment Judge Alliott, with lay members Mrs G Bhatt MBE and Mr S Woodward. The written judgment records that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, discrimination arising from disability and victimisation were all dismissed.
The extracted text does not include the tribunal's detailed reasons. It notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so the only recorded outcome in the supplied text is dismissal of each claim. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment describes this claim as discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.