Case 3312589/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Shamoo v Transport for London Underground Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312589/2022
- Decision date
- 27 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Shamoo
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 20 July 2023, the claimant's representative accepted that the claimant could not bring an ordinary unfair dismissal complaint because he had worked for the respondent(s) for less than two years. The representative also accepted that the discrimination complaint relating to dismissal was not a complaint of automatic unfair dismissal, but a complaint of discriminatory dismissal.
The tribunal had allowed time for the claimant to confirm whether the unfair dismissal complaint would be withdrawn. The claimant did not confirm his position by the deadline, and Employment Judge Hawksworth struck out the unfair dismissal complaint on the basis that it had no reasonable prospects of success. The remaining complaints, including discriminatory dismissal, were listed to proceed to hearing on 30 September 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The ordinary unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and the claimant did not confirm withdrawal after being given time to do so. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.