Case 3312622/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Oakshott v The Felixstowe Dock and Railway Company — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312622/2022
- Decision date
- 31 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Oakshott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a public preliminary hearing on the respondent's application to strike out out-of-time elements of the disability discrimination case. The tribunal clarified that the claimant continued to pursue unfair dismissal and disability discrimination connected with his dismissal, but was not pursuing whistleblowing or reasonable adjustments claims.
The tribunal identified four allegations said to amount to disability-related harassment, with the latest alleged incident in August 2021. It held that, even taking the claimant's case at its highest, there was no reasonable prospect of persuading the tribunal at trial that those incidents formed part of a continuing course of conduct culminating in the dismissal. The judge also noted there was no discernible link between the harassment allegations and the dismissal decision, and that it was unclear how the matters complained of related to disability in any event.
The tribunal further held there was no reasonable prospect of establishing that it would be just and equitable to extend time. It considered the delay, the likely impact on the cogency of evidence, and the relative prejudice to the parties. It therefore struck out the harassment related to disability claim, while the unfair dismissal and dismissal-related disability discrimination complaints remained extant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The only adjudicated claim in this preliminary hearing was harassment related to disability. It was struck out because the tribunal found no reasonable prospects of establishing a continuing course of conduct bringing the allegations in time, or of obtaining a just and equitable extension of time. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Rule 37 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- Anyanwu v Southbank Student Union
- ABN Amro Management Services and Royal Bank of Scotland v Hogben
- Morgan v Royal Mencap Society
- overriding objective
- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.