Case 3312625/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 3312625/2022
- Decision date
- 12 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge French Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Watford, before Employment Judge French and with the claimant in person and the respondent represented by Mr Lyons, heard the matter from 7 to 10 July 2025. It dismissed all complaints: constructive unfair dismissal, direct disability discrimination, indirect disability discrimination, harassment related to disability, unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability, and victimisation.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability claim. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability claim. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability claim. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect disability discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.