Case 3312839/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs I G Norocel v Meads Construction Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312839/2020
- Decision date
- 8 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs I G Norocel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Mrs I G Norocel's claim against Meads Construction Limited under rule 37. The tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 15 August 2021, it gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 27 May 2021 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter.
Because no response was received, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a strike-out under rule 37. It says the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 27 May 2021 and had not actively pursued the claim. No substantive claim type is identified in the decision text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.