Case 3312894/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. Nakra v Breezemount Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3312894/2022
- Decision date
- 1 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H. Mason Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. Nakra
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered the claimant's claim of unfair dismissal, described in the judgment as constructive or otherwise. It struck out that claim on the basis that the claimant had less than two years' service and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction.
The order states that the claimant's remaining claims will continue. It does not determine those remaining claims, identify any remedy, or name any legal test beyond the jurisdictional reason given for striking out the unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of unfair dismissal, constructive or otherwise, was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction. The claimant's remaining claims were stated to continue and were not determined in this order. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.