Case 3312959/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312959/2022
- Decision date
- 6 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mrs J Hancock, Mrs A Brosnan
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe unanimous tribunal comprised Employment Judge Bansal with lay members Mrs J Hancock and Mrs A Brosnan. The judgment records that the claimant’s direct sex discrimination claim under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to sex under s.26 Equality Act 2010 succeeded only in respect of the complaint concerning the conduct of the grievance hearing dated 24 October 2022; the other complaints in paragraphs 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.4, 3.1.5 and 3.1.6 of the List of Issues were dismissed. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation under s.27 Equality Act 2010 succeeded in respect of the complaints at paragraphs 4.3.1, 4.3.4, 4.3.6 and 4.3.7 of the List of Issues; the complaints at paragraphs 4.3.2, 4.3.3 and 4.3.5 were dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.