Case 3313001/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Humphries v Cascade (Charlton House) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3313001/2023
- Decision date
- 6 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Humphries
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 30 January 2025 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why her claims should not be struck out for non-compliance with an order requiring further information, and/or because she could not attend the listed hearing. The claimant replied the same day in terms indicating no intention to comply with the order.
When the claimant still had not complied by 1 May 2025, the tribunal wrote again asking whether she was abandoning the claim. Her response on 6 May 2025 indicated that she did not intend to comply with the order or otherwise press the case. The tribunal therefore struck out the claims under rule 38(1)(b), (c) and/or (d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
Claims and outcomes
10 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The pleaded constructive unfair dismissal claim was struck out under rule 38 after the claimant did not comply with the tribunal's order and indicated no intention to press the case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Part of the pleaded direct discrimination claim, which also referred to race, sexual orientation, and religion or belief; all claims were struck out together. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | Part of the pleaded direct discrimination claim, which also referred to sex, sexual orientation, and religion or belief; all claims were struck out together. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Part of the pleaded direct discrimination claim, which also referred to sex, race, and religion or belief; all claims were struck out together. | Struck out | Sexual orientation | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Part of the pleaded direct discrimination claim, which also referred to sex, race, and sexual orientation; all claims were struck out together. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | Part of the pleaded harassment claim, which also referred to sexual orientation and religion or belief; all claims were struck out together. |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 38(1)(b) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(c) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.