Case 3313088/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gabriel Severi v Bridewell Consulting Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3313088/2023
- Decision date
- 25 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr D Bean, Mr A Scott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gabriel Severi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a Senior Consultant from 26 June 2023 and was dismissed with immediate effect on 17 October 2023, with one week's notice paid in lieu. He brought claims for disability discrimination in several forms, harassment related to disability, victimisation, and wrongful dismissal / notice pay.
The tribunal found some factual matters proved, including that the claimant had requested reasonable adjustments and raised issues about them, and that some alleged acts were detriments. However, it found that reasonable adjustments had been implemented after the 17 August 2023 meeting, that the performance management, grievance and appeal processes were not improper, and that the probation review outcome was based on genuine performance concerns.
The tribunal found that the claimant's unsuccessful job application in November 2024 was because he was less qualified than candidates already shortlisted, and that the working-hours allegation was raised because serious disciplinary concerns had arisen, not because of protected acts. All claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as wrongful dismissal / notice pay and dismisses it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect disability discrimination was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Equality Act 2010 section 6
- Equality Act 2010 section 13
- Equality Act 2010 section 15
- Equality Act 2010 section 123
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.