Case 3313123/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Day (In person) For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3313123/2021
- Decision date
- 10 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen
- Venue
- Watford Tribunal
- Panel members
- Mr N Boustred, Mr S Bury
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms L Day (In person) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld three complaints of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability. Those findings related to the respondent promoting another team member into the Claimant's SAP office job role on a permanent basis with effect on or about 8 August 2020, demoting the Claimant from her SAP office role to a picking role in March 2020, and deciding on 3 March 2021 not to move her back to the office role.
The remaining complaint under that head was dismissed. The tribunal also dismissed the Claimant's complaints of direct discrimination and her complaints of harassment related to disability.
The respondent was ordered to pay £9,426.66 within 28 days. That sum comprised £7,000 for injury to feelings and £2,426.66 in interest. The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaints of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability were well-founded in respect of three matters: promoting another team member into the Claimant's SAP office job role on a permanent basis with effect on or about 8 August 2020; demoting the Claimant from her SAP office role to a picking role in March 2020; and the decision on 3 March 2021 not to move the Claimant back to her office role. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Other | The remaining complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The Claimant's complaints of direct discrimination were not well-founded and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The Claimant's complaints of harassment related to disability were not well-founded and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,427
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.