Case 3313176/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Enwezoh v Cygnet Health Care Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313176/2020
- Decision date
- 26 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Enwezoh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 14 May 2022, to make representations or request a hearing on why strike-out should not occur.
The tribunal stated that the claimant had conducted the proceedings unreasonably and had not complied with tribunal orders dated 17 January 2022 and 14 May 2022. It further found that the claimant failed to make written representations, or any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The hearing listed for 1 to 4 August 2022 was therefore cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out. Inclusion of age discrimination is based on the case listing categories rather than the reasons text. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out. Inclusion of breach of contract is based on the case listing categories rather than the reasons text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out. Inclusion of disability discrimination is based on the case listing categories rather than the reasons text. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out. Inclusion of unfair dismissal is based on the case listing categories rather than the reasons text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.