Case 3313228/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Hamza v Enterprise Rent A Car UK Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313228/2020
- Decision date
- 9 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Hamza
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis short judgment disposed only of the claimant's Equality Act claims that were withdrawn. The tribunal recorded that Mr Hamza's claims of discrimination under sections 13 and 19 of the Equality Act 2010, and his victimisation claim under section 27, both brought against Enterprise Rent-A-Car UK Limited under section 39(2)(d), were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment does not identify the protected characteristic said to underlie the discrimination claim, and it does not make any merits findings on those withdrawn claims. It then states that the claimant's other claims, including the point that his dismissal was contrary to section 39(2)(c) of the Equality Act 2010, continued.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers to claims of discrimination under sections 13 and 19 of the Equality Act 2010, but it does not identify the protected characteristic relied on. Those claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Victimisation | Claim under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010, brought against the respondent under section 39(2)(d); dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.