Case 3313272/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Kiraly v Bristol Superlight Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3313272/2020
- Decision date
- 18 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Kiraly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Hawksworth in which the claimant, Miss M Kiraly, succeeded on two money claims against Bristol Superlight Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £9,123.80 net.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant for 7.71 days of accrued but untaken holiday and ordered payment of £754.27 net. No separate injury to feelings, interest, or other remedy was recorded in the judgment text provided. The bottom-line award shown on the face of the decision is £9,878.07 net in total.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £9,123.80. | Upheld | — | £9,124 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant in respect of 7.71 days accrued but untaken holiday and ordered payment of the net sum of £754.27. | Upheld | — | £754 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,878
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.