Case 3313291/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Sackey v John Lewis Partnership plc and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 3313291/2019
- Decision date
- 8 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr R Sackey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr R Sackey brought claims against John Lewis Partnership plc, John Lewis and Partners Foundation, and John Lewis plc. The hearing was before Employment Judge Foxwell sitting alone at Cambridge on 8 January 2020.
The tribunal dismissed the claims against John Lewis Partnership plc and John Lewis and Partners Foundation on withdrawal. The judgment expressly states that the claims against John Lewis plc were unaffected by this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claims against John Lewis Partnership plc and John Lewis and Partners Foundation are dismissed on withdrawal. The claims against John Lewis plc are expressly unaffected by this judgment. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The gov.uk listing category identifies disability discrimination, but the judgment itself does not set out the specific discrimination allegations. The judgment states that the claims against John Lewis Partnership plc and John Lewis and Partners Foundation are dismissed on withdrawal, with the claims against John Lewis plc unaffected. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.