Case 3313378/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Stevenage Conference Centre Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313378/2020
- Decision date
- 27 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response and did not attend or have representation at the remedy hearing. The tribunal recorded that papers had been served at various registered-office addresses without success, and held that the claimant was entitled to judgment.
The claimant was told in writing at the end of the 80% furlough period, 31 July 2020, that his employment would cease. The tribunal found that he had been employed from 27 March 2018 to 31 July 2020, had average weekly pay of £405 gross and £331.85 net, and was dismissed by reason of redundancy.
The tribunal awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £810, contractual notice pay of £2,876 for breach of contract, and £405 gross for five days' accrued but unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £810 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract because he was entitled to two months' contractual notice. | Upheld | — | £2,876 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded five days' accrued but unpaid holiday pay, stated as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £405 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,091
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.