Case 3313394/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Daley (friend) For the v Mr P Bain (solicitor) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313394/2022
- Decision date
- 11 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wyeth Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Daley (friend) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing on 29 March 2023 before Employment Judge Wyeth, the tribunal considered the claimant's claims against Premier Hulse Limited. The unfair dismissal claim was struck out because it had been issued prematurely and the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear that complaint.
The tribunal also dealt with the claimant's complaints described as sex harassment, sexual harassment and direct sex discrimination. It recorded that those complaints remained extant insofar as they related to matters occurring on or before 8 November 2022, and it found them to be in time. This judgment did not determine liability on those complaints and did not record any award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claim was issued prematurely and the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Struck out | — | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records this complaint as remaining extant and found to be in time insofar as it relates to matters occurring on or before 8 November 2022; no final liability decision was made in this judgment. | Other | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records this complaint as remaining extant and found to be in time insofar as it relates to matters occurring on or before 8 November 2022; no final liability decision was made in this judgment. | Other | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records this complaint as remaining extant and found to be in time insofar as it relates to matters occurring on or before 8 November 2022; no final liability decision was made in this judgment. | Other | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.