Mrs M Hinton-Smith v The Range — 2019

Case reference: 3313484/2019
Decision date: 18 September 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Postle

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs M Hinton-Smith

Respondent

The Range

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By a letter dated 13 September 2019, the tribunal gave Mrs M Hinton-Smith an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that she had not complied with the Case Management Order of 17 April 2019 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.

The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 18 September 2019 did not take place.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action in the reasons. It records that the claim was struck out for failure to comply with the Case Management Order of 17 April 2019 and because it had not been actively pursued. The accompanying GOV.UK listing categorises the case as unlawful deduction from wages, but that is not stated in the judgment text itself.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.