Case 3313529/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Ms X v Shared Services Connected Limited — 2023

Case reference: 3313529/2022
Decision date: 14 June 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms X

Respondent

Shared Services Connected Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By an order dated 14 June 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.

The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The extracted judgment does not set out the substantive nature of the claim in the body of the text, so the procedural outcome is recorded here as a strike out rather than a merits determination.

The judgment also states that the claim continued against the Secretary of State for Justice as the sole respondent. No monetary award is recorded in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the extracted text. It records that the claim against Shared Services Connected Limited was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success, while the claim continued against the Secretary of State for Justice as the sole respondent.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.