Case 3313772/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Sheriff v The London Borough of Haringey — 2025
- Case reference
- 3313772/2023
- Decision date
- 29 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Sheriff
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant brought this claim as part of a multiple with case number 3313771/2023, but the two cases were based on different facts and did not give rise to common questions of law. It also recorded that the claimant had not set out the specific grounds on which this claim was being made.
The claimant had been ordered on 15 August 2024 to provide details of an impact statement and medical evidence and had not done so. The claimant also did not attend the preliminary hearing for case management and had not been in contact with the other parties.
The Tribunal was satisfied that the claimant was not interested in pursuing the case further and that it was not being actively pursued. The claim relating to Ms K Sheriff, case number 3313772/2023, was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024, while the related claim by C Ioannou continued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim but does not identify the specific causes of action or protected characteristics within the text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.