Case 3314465/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Stevenage Conference Centre Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3314465/2020
- Decision date
- 27 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent had not presented a response to the claim, and the tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to judgment. The tribunal recorded that efforts had been made to serve papers at various registered office addresses for the respondent without success.
The claimant was told in writing at the end of the 80% furlough period, on 31 July 2020, that her employment would cease. The tribunal found she was dismissed by reason of redundancy, had been employed from 9 February 2019 to 31 July 2020, and was not entitled to a statutory redundancy payment.
The tribunal found that the claimant had not received notice pay or accrued holiday pay. It awarded damages for breach of contract for four weeks' contractual notice and a further sum for 12 days of accrued but untaken holiday.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy but was not entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as damages for 4 weeks' contractual notice. | Upheld | — | £1,160 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for 12 days of accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £803 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,963
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.