Case 3314586/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Kanjeru v West London NHS Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 3314586/2019
- Decision date
- 12 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Kanjeru
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 9/10/2019, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the complaints of race discrimination and holiday pay should not be struck out. The reason recorded was that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's Unless Order dated 9/10/2019.
The judgment states that the complaints of race discrimination and holiday pay were struck out. The remaining claim of unfair dismissal was not determined in this judgment and was left listed for hearing on 24/2/2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal struck out the race discrimination complaint under rule 37 after the claimant did not comply with the Unless Order dated 9/10/2019 and did not make representations or request a hearing in response to the strike-out letter. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay complaint was struck out together with the race discrimination complaint for the same procedural reason arising from non-compliance with the Unless Order dated 9/10/2019. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- Unless Order
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.