Case 3314725/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kevin Bijou v DHL Parcel UK Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3314725/2020
- Decision date
- 13 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Members
- Venue
- Nottingham
- Panel members
- Mr J Akhtar, Mr C Tansley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Kevin Bijou
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Kevin Bijou brought race discrimination proceedings against DHL Parcel UK Ltd arising from work at the East Midlands Area Distribution Centre. The tribunal determined jurisdiction as a preliminary issue under section 41 of the Equality Act 2010 and found that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claims.
The tribunal found that from 17 January 2017 the relevant contract was between DHL and Knight Rider Express Couriers Limited, a company of which Mr Bijou was the sole director and shareholder. Knight Rider engaged its own drivers, used its own vehicles, bore its own operating costs, and paid its personnel itself. Mr Bijou signed the contract on behalf of Knight Rider and the tribunal found that he operated the business as an entrepreneur rather than under a contract requiring personal service to DHL.
The tribunal accepted that Mr Bijou sometimes drove routes himself, but found that the reality of the arrangement did not require him to personally perform the work. It concluded that the contractual obligations rested on Knight Rider, that DHL was a customer of that business, and that the operational arrangements, including route allocation, substitution, uniform and vehicle livery requirements, did not amount to the degree of personal employment or worker status needed for Equality Act protection. The race discrimination claims were therefore dismissed and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under section 41 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found Mr Bijou was neither an employee nor a contract worker of DHL Parcel UK Ltd, and it made no further findings on the allegations. The pleaded allegations included harassment and victimisation within the race discrimination case, but they were not determined separately. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- section 83(2)(a) Equality Act 2010
- section 41 Equality Act 2010
- Pimlico Plumbers v Smith
- Uber BV v Aslam
- Sejpal v Rodericks Dental Limited
- Carmichael v National Power Plc
- Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bottrill
- Clark v Clark Construction Initiatives Limited
- Hospital Medical Group v Westwood
- Cotswold Developments Construction Ltd v Williams
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.