Case 3314741/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v No appearance or attendance. — 2020
- Case reference
- 3314741/2020
- Decision date
- 28 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for Barry’s Cars and Minibuses Ltd as a minibus driver from 24 September 2020. He said he was paid £10 per hour, that breaks between jobs were unpaid, and that he was entitled to a minimum of 37.5 hours' work per week. He resigned on 29 October 2020 and brought claims for unpaid wages and untaken holiday pay. The respondent did not attend the hearing or provide evidence.
On the unpaid wages claim, the tribunal preferred the claimant’s evidence to the respondent’s version of events. It accepted the claimant’s account that he attended a First Aid course on 26 October 2020 and worked on 27 October 2020, supported by photographs, messages to his fiancé, and a tachograph. The tribunal found that he had not been paid for those two days and held that he was entitled to 11 hours' unpaid wages, namely 7 hours on 26 October and 4 hours on 27 October 2020, totalling £110.
On holiday pay, the tribunal accepted that there was no evidence the claimant had taken paid holiday while employed. As he had been employed between 24 September and 28 October 2020, the tribunal held that he was entitled to 0.54 of a week’s pay, calculated as 5.6 weeks multiplied by the proportion of the leave year worked. Because he had been employed for less than 12 weeks and did not have normal working hours, the tribunal applied section 228 Employment Rights Act 1996 and used the average of his weekly pay during the four complete weeks for which he was paid. That figure was £390.55 gross, producing holiday pay of £211.
The judgment therefore awarded £110 for unlawful deduction from wages and £211 for annual leave entitlement, making a total of £321.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant was unpaid for 11 hours' work on 26 and 27 October 2020, comprising 7 hours on 26 October and 4 hours on 27 October. | Upheld | — | £110 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found there was no evidence the claimant had taken paid holiday. It calculated entitlement at 0.54 of a week's pay and used an average weekly pay of £390.55 gross under section 228 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £211 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £321
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 228 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.