Case 3315215/2023 · Employment Tribunal
the Claimant attended without a representative For the v Ms A. Meredith — 2026
- Case reference
- 3315215/2023
- Decision date
- 19 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M. Hunt Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
the Claimant attended without a representative For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered the Respondent's application to strike out the claim. The application succeeded in part.
The Tribunal struck out specified complaints of direct discrimination, harassment, victimisation, and disability discrimination by way of failure to make adjustments. The written record states that those complaints were struck out because the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine them, as they had been brought too late.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment struck out complaints described as direct discrimination and disability discrimination by way of failure to make adjustments because they were brought too late. The direct discrimination paragraphs are not further described in the short written record. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The harassment complaint recorded in paragraph 37 of the case management order was struck out as brought too late. The short written record does not set out further details. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation complaint recorded in paragraph 38.2.2 of the case management order was struck out as brought too late. The short written record does not set out further details. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.